NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 174.97
$ 5.03 slightly less expensive
$ 180.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3968 points
167% significantly better overall score
1483 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

88 FPS
55 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
32 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

53 FPS
30 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
23 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

64 FPS
42 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
22 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

40 FPS
22 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
18 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Quadro P2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

6332 points
114% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
2953 points
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

799.88 points
255% significantly higher Blender score
225.21 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

66368 points
206% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
21668 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

61373 points
157% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
23869 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

53550 points
131% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
23151 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

65938 points
189% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
22747 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

62004 points
163% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
23501 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1500 MHz
39% slightly higher core clock speed
1076 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1770 MHz
19% slightly higher boost clock speed
1480 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit
20% slightly larger memory bus width
160 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s
105% significantly higher memory bandwidth
140.2 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W
75 W
60% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

84.96 Gigapixels/s
43% significantly higher pixel rate
59.2 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

169.9 Gigatexels/s
79% significantly higher texture rate
94.72 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.44 TFLOPS
79% significantly better floating point performance
3.03 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536
49% significantly more shading units
1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

96
49% significantly more texture mapping units
64

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

48
20% slightly more render output processors
40

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

124th of 586
234th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February
2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Quadro P2000 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GPU is faster than the Quadro P2000 in gaming.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the Quadro P2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti at 120 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is better than the Quadro P2000.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons