NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 174.97

$ 134.75

$ 40.22 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3968 points

216% significantly better overall score

1252 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

88 FPS

61 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

27 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

53 FPS

34 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

19 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

64 FPS

47 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

17 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

40 FPS

25 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

15 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Quadro M4000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

6332 points

175% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

2302 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

799.88 points

260% significantly higher Blender score

221.61 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

66368 points

298% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

16648 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

61373 points

234% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

18372 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

53550 points

155% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

20969 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

65938 points

229% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

20001 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

62004 points

160% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

23838 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1500 MHz

87% significantly higher core clock speed

800 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB

8 GiB

33% slightly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

256 Bit

33% slightly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s

49% significantly higher memory bandwidth

192.3 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W

Identical

120 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

84.96 Gigapixels/s

71% significantly higher pixel rate

49.47 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

169.9 Gigatexels/s

111% significantly higher texture rate

80.39 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.44 TFLOPS

111% significantly better floating point performance

2.57 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536

1664

8% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

104

8% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

33% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

124th of 586

247th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February

2015 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

12.4

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Quadro M4000 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GPU is faster than the Quadro M4000 in gaming.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro M4000 has slightly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 6 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, both the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Quadro M4000 have an identical TDP. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti over the Quadro M4000.