NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 174.97
$ 224.98 significantly less expensive
$ 399.95

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3968 points
262% significantly better overall score
1094 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

88 FPS
63 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
25 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

53 FPS
37 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
16 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

64 FPS
49 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
15 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

40 FPS
26 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
14 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Quadro M3000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

799.88 points
196% significantly higher Blender score
269.47 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

66368 points
323% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
15678 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

61373 points
253% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
17348 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

53550 points
205% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
17520 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

65938 points
299% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
16504 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

62004 points
270% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
16744 points

Specifications

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB
49% significantly more memory
4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit
256 Bit
33% slightly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s
79% significantly higher memory bandwidth
160.4 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W
75 W
60% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

84.96 Gigapixels/s
152% significantly higher pixel rate
33.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

169.9 Gigatexels/s
152% significantly higher texture rate
67.2 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.44 TFLOPS
152% significantly better floating point performance
2.15 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536
49% significantly more shading units
1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

96
49% significantly more texture mapping units
64

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

48
49% significantly more render output processors
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

124th of 586
257th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February
2015 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Quadro M3000M specs and performance

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti graphics card is better than the Quadro M3000M in our tests.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has significantly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro M3000M has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti at 120 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti over the Quadro M3000M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons