NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 174.97

$ 170.10

$ 4.87 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3968 points

57% significantly better overall score

2513 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

88 FPS

26 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

62 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

53 FPS

17 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

36 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

64 FPS

24 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

41 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

40 FPS

9 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

31 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Quadro K5200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

799.88 points

184% significantly higher Blender score

281.16 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

66368 points

383% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

13735 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

61373 points

282% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

16029 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

53550 points

199% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

17881 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

65938 points

245% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

19104 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

62004 points

207% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

20167 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1500 MHz

130% significantly higher core clock speed

650 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1770 MHz

129% significantly higher boost clock speed

771 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB

8 GiB

33% slightly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

256 Bit

33% slightly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s

49% significantly higher memory bandwidth

192.3 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W

25% slightly lower TDP

150 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

84.96 Gigapixels/s

129% significantly higher pixel rate

37.01 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

169.9 Gigatexels/s

14% slightly higher texture rate

148 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.44 TFLOPS

53% significantly better floating point performance

3.55 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536

2304

49% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

192

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

124th of 586

176th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Quadro K5200 comparison

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti beats the Quadro K5200 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro K5200 has slightly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 6 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a slightly lower TDP at 120 W when compared to the Quadro K5200 at 150 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is better than the Quadro K5200.