NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 174.97

$ 149.46

$ 25.51 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3968 points

341% significantly better overall score

899 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

88 FPS

68 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

20 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

53 FPS

41 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

13 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

64 FPS

51 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

14 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

40 FPS

30 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

10 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Quadro K4200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

799.88 points

370% significantly higher Blender score

170.14 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

66368 points

639% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

8973 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

61373 points

422% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

11745 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

53550 points

369% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

11396 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

65938 points

435% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

12321 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

62004 points

398% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

12444 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1500 MHz

92% significantly higher core clock speed

780 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1770 MHz

125% significantly higher boost clock speed

784 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB

49% significantly more memory

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

256 Bit

33% slightly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s

66% significantly higher memory bandwidth

172.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W

105 W

14% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

84.96 Gigapixels/s

287% significantly higher pixel rate

21.95 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

169.9 Gigatexels/s

93% significantly higher texture rate

87.81 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.44 TFLOPS

158% significantly better floating point performance

2.11 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536

14% slightly more shading units

1344

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

16% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

124th of 586

271st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Quadro K4200 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GPU is faster than the Quadro K4200 in gaming.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has significantly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro K4200 has a slightly lower TDP at 105 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti at 120 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is faster than the Quadro K4200.