NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 174.97
$ 120.11
$ 54.86 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3968 points
470% significantly better overall score
695 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

88 FPS
75 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
13 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

53 FPS
42 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
11 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

64 FPS
54 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
10 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

40 FPS
30 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
10 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Quadro K2200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

799.88 points
535% significantly higher Blender score
125.93 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

66368 points
474% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
11549 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

61373 points
410% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
12020 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

53550 points
376% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
11238 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

65938 points
475% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
11456 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

62004 points
514% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
10094 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1500 MHz
49% significantly higher core clock speed
1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1770 MHz
57% significantly higher boost clock speed
1124 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB
49% significantly more memory
4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit
49% significantly larger memory bus width
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s
259% significantly higher memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W
68 W
76% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

84.96 Gigapixels/s
372% significantly higher pixel rate
17.98 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

169.9 Gigatexels/s
277% significantly higher texture rate
44.96 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536
139% significantly more shading units
640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

96
139% significantly more texture mapping units
40

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

48
200% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

124th of 586
291st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February
2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Quadro K2200 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti beats the Quadro K2200 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has significantly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro K2200 has a significantly lower TDP at 68 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti at 120 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is faster than the Quadro K2200.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons