NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200 5 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3236 points
52% significantly better overall score
2123 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

73 FPS
29 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
44 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

46 FPS
12 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
34 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

54 FPS
26 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
28 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

34 FPS
8 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate
26 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and the Quadro P2200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

4964 points
45% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
3404 points
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

756.05 points
134% significantly higher Blender score
322.37 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

61528 points
102% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
30389 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

54310 points
64% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
32972 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

48658 points
45% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
33482 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

56770 points
75% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
32320 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

54216 points
73% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
31299 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1140 MHz
13% slightly higher core clock speed
1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1335 MHz
1493 MHz
11% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB
20% slightly more memory
5 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit
20% slightly larger memory bus width
160 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s
43% significantly higher memory bandwidth
200.2 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

60 W
25% slightly lower TDP
75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

64.08 Gigapixels/s
7% slightly higher pixel rate
59.72 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

128.2 Gigatexels/s
7% slightly higher texture rate
119.4 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.10 TFLOPS
7% slightly better floating point performance
3.82 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536
20% slightly more shading units
1280

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

96
20% slightly more texture mapping units
80

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

48
20% slightly more render output processors
40

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

145th of 586
201st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April
2019 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
GDDR5X

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro P2200 specs and performance

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q graphics card is better than the Quadro P2200 in our tests.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the Quadro P2200 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

As stated by the manufacturer, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has slightly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 5 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a slightly lower TDP at 60 W when compared to the Quadro P2200 at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q over the Quadro P2200.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons