NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 191.88

$ 125.00

$ 66.88 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3755 points

285% significantly better overall score

974 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

84 FPS

63 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

21 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

50 FPS

35 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

14 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

61 FPS

46 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

14 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

38 FPS

26 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

12 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and the Quadro M2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

776.88 points

473% significantly higher Blender score

135.49 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

65154 points

397% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

13100 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

60772 points

306% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

14953 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

55624 points

261% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

15367 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

64068 points

339% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

14584 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

60513 points

317% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

14502 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1530 MHz

29% slightly higher core clock speed

1180 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1785 MHz

53% significantly higher boost clock speed

1163 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB

49% significantly more memory

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

49% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

336 GB/s

217% significantly higher memory bandwidth

105.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

125 W

75 W

66% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

85.68 Gigapixels/s

130% significantly higher pixel rate

37.22 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

157.1 Gigatexels/s

181% significantly higher texture rate

55.82 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.03 TFLOPS

181% significantly better floating point performance

1.79 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1408

83% significantly more shading units

768

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

83% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

129th of 586

264th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 October

2016 April

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Quadro M2000 specs and performance

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER graphics card is better than the Quadro M2000 in our tests.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has significantly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro M2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER at 125 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is better than the Quadro M2000.