NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 249.99

$ 119.99

$ 130.00 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

404% significantly better overall score

445 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

42 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

11 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

24 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

7 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

27 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

10 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

19 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

4 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

144% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

15640 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

117% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

16510 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

172% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

14637 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

140% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

15582 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

14% slightly higher core clock speed

1295 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s

33% slightly higher memory bandwidth

96 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

65 W

15% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

157% significantly higher pixel rate

20.72 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

125% significantly higher texture rate

41.44 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.98 TFLOPS

79% significantly better floating point performance

1.66 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

40% slightly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

344th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2019 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1650 beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1650 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has a slightly lower TDP at 65 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 is better than the Radeon Pro WX 3200.