NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points
3% slightly better overall score
2160 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS
3 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
50 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS
2 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate
28 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS
42 FPS
6 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS
9 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
14 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Radeon Pro 5300? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

445.31 points
47% significantly higher Blender score
301.33 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points
6% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
36134 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points
29% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
27794 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points
2% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
38710 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points
4% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
35915 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz
48% significantly higher core clock speed
1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz
0.91% slightly higher boost clock speed
1650 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
Identical
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s
224 GB/s
74% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
13% slightly lower TDP
85 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s
0.91% slightly higher pixel rate
52.8 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s
132 Gigatexels/s
41% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.98 TFLOPS
4.22 TFLOPS
41% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896
1280
42% many more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

56
80
42% many more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
Identical
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586
197th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April
2020 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro 5300 comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 graphics card is better than the Radeon Pro 5300 in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a slightly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Radeon Pro 5300 at 85 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 over the Radeon Pro 5300.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons