NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 249.99

$ 1249.96 significantly less expensive

$ 1499.95

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

16207 points

622% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

382 FPS

330 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

188 FPS

157 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

275 FPS

239 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

151 FPS

128 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

3627 points

21929 points

504% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

445.31 points

6069.41 points

1262% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

40258 points

260346 points

546% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

229738 points

499% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

141134 points

293% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

207329 points

420% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

187369 points

399% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

1560 MHz

5% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz

6% slightly higher boost clock speed

1560 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

24 GiB

499% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

384 Bit

200% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s

1008 GB/s

686% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

499% significantly lower TDP

450 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

208.3 Gigapixels/s

290% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

625 Gigatexels/s

570% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.98 TFLOPS

40 TFLOPS

1240% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

10752

1100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

336

499% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

112

250% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

16th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2022 January

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6X

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti comparison

For gaming, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti graphics card is better than the GeForce GTX 1650 in our tests.

Our database shows that the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has significantly more memory with 24 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti at 450 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is better than the GeForce GTX 1650.