NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

Compare GeForce GTX 1650 vs. RTX 3060: GPU performance, specs, and pricing. Find which NVIDIA graphics card suits you.

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 249.99
$ 34.18 slightly less expensive
$ 284.17

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points
5276 points
135% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS
126 FPS
74 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS
61 FPS
30 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS
88 FPS
52 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS
48 FPS
25 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce RTX 3060? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Gaming Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS

Ultra settings at 1080p

47 FPS
62 FPS
15 FPS significantly higher Cyberpunk 2077 FPS
ELDEN RING FPS

ELDEN RING FPS

Ultra settings at 1080p

38 FPS
60 FPS
22 FPS significantly higher ELDEN RING FPS
God of War FPS

God of War FPS

Ultra settings at 1080p

51 FPS
84 FPS
33 FPS significantly higher God of War FPS
Grand Theft Auto V FPS

Grand Theft Auto V FPS

Ultra settings at 1080p

65 FPS
144 FPS
79 FPS significantly higher Grand Theft Auto V FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2 FPS

Red Dead Redemption 2 FPS

Ultra settings at 1080p

38 FPS
75 FPS
37 FPS significantly higher Red Dead Redemption 2 FPS

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

3627 points
8766 points
141% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

445.31 points
2317.27 points
420% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

40258 points
99213 points
146% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points
96416 points
151% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points
74845 points
108% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points
89510 points
124% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points
86221 points
129% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz
12% slightly higher core clock speed
1320 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz
1777 MHz
6% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
12 GiB
200% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
192 Bit
49% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s
360 GB/s
181% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
126% significantly lower TDP
170 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s
85.3 Gigapixels/s
60% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s
199 Gigatexels/s
113% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.98 TFLOPS
12.74 TFLOPS
326% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896
3584
300% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

56
112
100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
48
49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

195th of 590
98th of 590

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April
2021 January

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

Comparing GPUs: GeForce GTX 1650 vs. GeForce RTX 3060

When it comes to choosing a graphics processing unit (GPU) for your gaming or professional needs, it's essential to consider various factors such as performance, price, and specific use cases. In this comparison, we'll dive into the specifications, benchmark scores, and pros and cons of two NVIDIA GPUs: the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce RTX 3060. Let's explore which GPU might be the best fit for your requirements.

What Are the Key Specifications?

Let's start by looking at the key specifications of both GPUs in a side-by-side comparison:

SpecificationGeForce GTX 1650GeForce RTX 3060
Core Clock1485 MHz1320 MHz
Boost Clock1665 MHz1777 MHz
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Size4 GiB12 GiB
Memory Bus Width128 bit192 bit
TDP75 W170 W
DirectX Support12.0012
OpenGL Support4.604.6

These specifications provide an initial overview of both GPUs. The RTX 3060 boasts higher memory capacity (12 GiB vs. 4 GiB) and a wider memory bus width (192 bit vs. 128 bit) compared to the GTX 1650, which can significantly impact gaming and graphics performance.

How Do They Perform in Benchmarks?

To understand the real-world performance differences, let's examine benchmark scores for both GPUs:

BenchmarkGeForce GTX 1650GeForce RTX 3060
3DMark Graphics3620 points8714 points
Blender435 points2445 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA)40258 points99213 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL)38315 points96416 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan)35907 points74845 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL)39666 points89260 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan)37364 points85064 points

The benchmark scores clearly indicate that the GeForce RTX 3060 outperforms the GeForce GTX 1650 across the board. It excels in 3D graphics, rendering tasks, and OpenCL and Vulkan workloads. This superior performance is a crucial advantage for gamers and content creators who demand high frame rates and efficient rendering.

Pricing Considerations

Price is often a significant factor in GPU selection. At the time of this comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 is available for approximately $319.99, while the GeForce RTX 3060 is priced at $754.99. It's evident that the RTX 3060 is considerably more expensive than the GTX 1650.

Use Cases and Recommendations

GeForce GTX 1650:

  • Budget-Conscious Gamers: The GTX 1650 is suitable for gamers on a tight budget who still want to enjoy modern titles at reasonable settings.
  • Entry-Level Content Creation: It can handle basic content creation tasks, such as video editing and 3D modeling, but not as efficiently as higher-end GPUs.

GeForce RTX 3060:

  • Enthusiast Gamers: Gamers who want to experience the latest games with high-quality graphics and ray tracing capabilities should opt for the RTX 3060.
  • Content Creators: Content creators working with 3D modeling, video editing, or other GPU-intensive tasks will benefit from the RTX 3060's superior performance.
  • Future-Proofing: If you're looking for a GPU that will remain relevant for years to come, the RTX 3060's higher performance and modern features make it a strong choice.

Benefits and Drawbacks

GeForce GTX 1650:

Pros:

  • Affordable price point.
  • Low power consumption (TDP).

Cons:

  • Limited VRAM and memory bandwidth.
  • Lower gaming and rendering performance compared to higher-tier GPUs.

GeForce RTX 3060:

Pros:

  • Exceptional gaming performance.
  • Ample VRAM for demanding tasks.
  • Ray tracing and DLSS support for cutting-edge visuals.

Cons:

  • Higher price tag.
  • Increased power consumption.

Evolution from Previous Models

The GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX 3060 represent different generations of NVIDIA GPUs. The RTX 3060 belongs to the RTX 30 series, which introduced significant improvements in ray tracing and AI-driven features. These advancements enhance both gaming and content creation experiences compared to the previous GTX 16 series, which includes the GTX 1650.

Conclusion

In the showdown between the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce RTX 3060, the latter emerges as the clear winner in terms of performance and capabilities. However, the decision ultimately depends on your budget and specific requirements. If you're on a tight budget or have modest gaming and content creation needs, the GTX 1650 can still provide a satisfactory experience. On the other hand, if you crave top-tier gaming and productivity performance, the RTX 3060 is worth the investment for its cutting-edge features and future-proofing potential.

Last updated Sep 30, 2023. Analysis by hardwareDB.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons