NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 12 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2299 points

39% slightly better overall score

1650 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

52 FPS

15 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

37 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

31 FPS

9 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

23 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

24 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

3 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

20 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and the Quadro K6000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

487.58 points

37% slightly higher Blender score

354.70 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

48337 points

175% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

17571 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

43645 points

147% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

17636 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

38972 points

71% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

22673 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

44811 points

87% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

23863 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

40263 points

58% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

25409 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1350 MHz

69% significantly higher core clock speed

797 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

12 GiB

200% significantly more memory

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W

309% significantly lower TDP

225 W

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

190th of 586

231st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.2

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro K6000 benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti graphics card is better than the Quadro K6000 in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro K6000 has significantly more memory with 12 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Quadro K6000 at 225 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is faster than the Quadro K6000.