NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2207 points

2550 points

15% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

47 FPS

60 FPS

13 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

29 FPS

41 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

35 FPS

51 FPS

16 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

22 FPS

3 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

18 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and the Radeon R9 Fury? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

3132 points

4754 points

51% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

40474 points

53458 points

32% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

36968 points

67144 points

81% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39947 points

51276 points

28% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

38942 points

61343 points

57% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1200 MHz

20% slightly higher boost clock speed

1000 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

4096 Bit

3100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160 GB/s

512 GB/s

220% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

685% significantly lower TDP

275 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

38.4 Gigapixels/s

64 Gigapixels/s

66% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

76.8 Gigatexels/s

224 Gigatexels/s

191% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.46 TFLOPS

7.17 TFLOPS

191% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

3584

250% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

224

250% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

195th of 586

174th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 Fury Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 April

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 Fury specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Radeon R9 Fury GPU is faster than the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q in gaming.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Radeon R9 Fury at 275 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R9 Fury is better than the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.