NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

AMD Radeon Pro 5300

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2207 points

2% slightly better overall score

2160 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

47 FPS

50 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

29 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

28 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

35 FPS

42 FPS

8 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

22 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

14 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and the Radeon Pro 5300? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

441.58 points

46% significantly higher Blender score

301.33 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

40474 points

12% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

36134 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

36968 points

33% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

27794 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39947 points

3% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

38710 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

38942 points

8% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

35915 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1035 MHz

3% slightly higher core clock speed

1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1200 MHz

1650 MHz

37% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160 GB/s

224 GB/s

40% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

142% significantly lower TDP

85 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

38.4 Gigapixels/s

52.8 Gigapixels/s

37% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

76.8 Gigatexels/s

132 Gigatexels/s

71% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.46 TFLOPS

4.22 TFLOPS

71% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

1280

25% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

25% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

195th of 586

198th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 April

2020 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 5300 specs and performance

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q graphics card is better than the Radeon Pro 5300 in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the Radeon Pro 5300 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Radeon Pro 5300 at 85 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is faster than the Radeon Pro 5300.