NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Intel HD 4400

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4 GB vs Intel HD 4400 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Intel HD 4400

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2207 points

2882% significantly better overall score

74 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

47 FPS

45 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

2 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

29 FPS

28 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

1 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

35 FPS

33 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

1 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

22 FPS

21 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and the HD 4400? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

40474 points

1660% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2299 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

36968 points

1543% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

2249 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39947 points

1768% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

2138 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

38942 points

1708% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

2153 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1035 MHz

417% significantly higher core clock speed

200 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1200 MHz

26% slightly higher boost clock speed

950 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

140% significantly more memory

1.66 GiB

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

20 W

75% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

38.4 Gigapixels/s

1921% significantly higher pixel rate

1.9 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

76.8 Gigatexels/s

304% significantly higher texture rate

19 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

540% significantly more shading units

160

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

220% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

1500% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

195th of 586

516th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 April

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.2

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.3

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs HD 4400 comparison

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q beats the HD 4400 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 1.66 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the HD 4400 has a significantly lower TDP at 20 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q at 35 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is better than the HD 4400.