NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 260X 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3115 points

299% significantly better overall score

779 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

73 FPS

54 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

19 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

43 FPS

32 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

11 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

52 FPS

35 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

16 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

32 FPS

26 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

6 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and the Radeon R7 260X? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

4690 points

212% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

1500 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1530 MHz

39% slightly higher core clock speed

1100 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1725 MHz

72% significantly higher boost clock speed

1000 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192 GB/s

84% significantly higher memory bandwidth

104 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W

15% slightly lower TDP

115 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

55.2 Gigapixels/s

213% significantly higher pixel rate

17.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

138 Gigatexels/s

124% significantly higher texture rate

61.6 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.42 TFLOPS

124% significantly better floating point performance

1.97 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1280

42% many more shading units

896

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

42% many more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

152nd of 586

283rd of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 November

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.4

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R7 260X comparison

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER beats the Radeon R7 260X in gaming performance.

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has a slightly lower TDP at 100 W when compared to the Radeon R7 260X at 115 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is better than the Radeon R7 260X.