NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 12 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 248.82

$ 21.14 slightly less expensive

$ 269.96

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3115 points

88% significantly better overall score

1650 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

73 FPS

36 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

37 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

43 FPS

20 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

23 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

52 FPS

28 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

24 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

32 FPS

12 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

20 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and the Quadro K6000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

556.14 points

56% significantly higher Blender score

354.70 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

57126 points

225% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

17571 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

53834 points

205% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

17636 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

49211 points

117% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

22673 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

56613 points

137% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

23863 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

54168 points

113% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

25409 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1530 MHz

91% significantly higher core clock speed

797 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1725 MHz

91% significantly higher boost clock speed

902 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

12 GiB

200% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

384 Bit

200% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192 GB/s

288.4 GB/s

50% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W

125% significantly lower TDP

225 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

55.2 Gigapixels/s

1% slightly higher pixel rate

54.12 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

138 Gigatexels/s

216.5 Gigatexels/s

56% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.42 TFLOPS

5.20 TFLOPS

17% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1280

2880

125% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

240

200% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

152nd of 586

231st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 November

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.2

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro K6000 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GPU is faster than the Quadro K6000 in gaming.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro K6000 has significantly more memory with 12 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has a significantly lower TDP at 100 W when compared to the Quadro K6000 at 225 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is faster than the Quadro K6000.