NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 248.82
$ 170.10
$ 78.72 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3115 points
23% slightly better overall score
2513 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

73 FPS
11 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
62 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

43 FPS
7 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate
36 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

52 FPS
11 FPS slightly higher City frame rate
41 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

32 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate
31 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and the Quadro K5200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

556.14 points
97% significantly higher Blender score
281.16 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

57126 points
315% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
13735 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

53834 points
235% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
16029 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

49211 points
175% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
17881 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

56613 points
196% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
19104 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

54168 points
168% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
20167 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1530 MHz
135% significantly higher core clock speed
650 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1725 MHz
123% significantly higher boost clock speed
771 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
8 GiB
100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192 GB/s
192.3 GB/s
0.16% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W
49% significantly lower TDP
150 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

55.2 Gigapixels/s
49% significantly higher pixel rate
37.01 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

138 Gigatexels/s
148 Gigatexels/s
7% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.42 TFLOPS
24% slightly better floating point performance
3.55 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1280
2304
79% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

80
192
139% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
48
49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

152nd of 586
176th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 November
2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro K5200 comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER graphics card is better than the Quadro K5200 in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro K5200 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has a significantly lower TDP at 100 W when compared to the Quadro K5200 at 150 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER over the Quadro K5200.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons