NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 3 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3115 points
115% significantly better overall score
1446 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

73 FPS
42 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
30 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

43 FPS
21 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
22 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

52 FPS
32 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
19 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

32 FPS
14 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
18 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and the GeForce GTX 970M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

4690 points
105% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
2280 points
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

556.14 points
169% significantly higher Blender score
206.38 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

57126 points
212% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
18285 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

53834 points
169% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
20012 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

49211 points
126% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
21753 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

56613 points
191% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
19440 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

54168 points
176% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
19602 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1530 MHz
65% significantly higher core clock speed
924 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1725 MHz
66% significantly higher boost clock speed
1038 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
33% slightly more memory
3 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
192 Bit
49% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192 GB/s
59% significantly higher memory bandwidth
120.3 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W
75 W
33% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

55.2 Gigapixels/s
10% slightly higher pixel rate
49.82 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

138 Gigatexels/s
66% significantly higher texture rate
83.04 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.42 TFLOPS
66% significantly better floating point performance
2.66 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1280
Identical
1280

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

80
Identical
80

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
48
49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

152nd of 586
238th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 November
2014 October

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 970M benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER graphics card is better than the GeForce GTX 970M in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has slightly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 3 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 970M has a slightly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER at 100 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is faster than the GeForce GTX 970M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons