NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1966 points

2513 points

27% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

44 FPS

62 FPS

18 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

27 FPS

36 FPS

9 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

32 FPS

41 FPS

9 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

20 FPS

31 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and the Quadro K5200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

379.89 points

35% slightly higher Blender score

281.16 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

37945 points

176% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

13735 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36447 points

127% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

16029 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

32737 points

83% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

17881 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36740 points

92% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

19104 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

34464 points

70% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

20167 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1020 MHz

56% significantly higher core clock speed

650 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1125 MHz

45% significantly higher boost clock speed

771 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

8 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160 GB/s

192.3 GB/s

20% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

328% significantly lower TDP

150 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

36 Gigapixels/s

37.01 Gigapixels/s

2% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

72 Gigatexels/s

148 Gigatexels/s

105% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.30 TFLOPS

3.55 TFLOPS

54% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

2304

125% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

192

200% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

210th of 586

176th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Quadro K5200 benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q graphics card is better than the Quadro K5200 in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro K5200 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Quadro K5200 at 150 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is faster than the Quadro K5200.