NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1966 points

1671% significantly better overall score

111 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

44 FPS

40 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

27 FPS

25 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

32 FPS

30 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

20 FPS

18 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and the Quadro K2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

379.89 points

1000% significantly higher Blender score

34.53 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

37945 points

1490% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

2385 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36447 points

1315% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2575 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

32737 points

1151% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

2616 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36740 points

1077% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3121 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

34464 points

1217% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

2616 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1020 MHz

36% slightly higher core clock speed

745 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160 GB/s

455% significantly higher memory bandwidth

28.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

57% significantly lower TDP

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

36 Gigapixels/s

504% significantly higher pixel rate

5.96 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

72 Gigatexels/s

202% significantly higher texture rate

23.84 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

166% significantly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

210th of 586

501st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2012 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Quadro K2000M comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q graphics card is better than the Quadro K2000M in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Quadro K2000M at 55 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is faster than the Quadro K2000M.