NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 169.99

$ 82.02

$ 87.97 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1159 points

165% significantly better overall score

436 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

26 FPS

16 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

10 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

18 FPS

12 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

6 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

18 FPS

9 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

9 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

14 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1050 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

18573 points

66% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

11128 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

17953 points

63% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

10972 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

17967 points

74% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

10310 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

17163 points

42% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

12066 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1354 MHz

46% significantly higher core clock speed

925 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1455 MHz

19% slightly higher boost clock speed

1219 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112.1 GB/s

133% significantly higher memory bandwidth

48 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

35 W

114% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

46.56 Gigapixels/s

138% significantly higher pixel rate

19.5 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

58.2 Gigatexels/s

49% significantly higher texture rate

39.01 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

1.86 TFLOPS

48% significantly better floating point performance

1.25 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640

25% slightly more shading units

512

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

25% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

253rd of 586

347th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 October

2017 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

GeForce GTX 1050 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1050 beats the Radeon Pro WX 2100 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1050 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1050 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1050 is faster than the Radeon Pro WX 2100.