NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 169.99
$ 144.02
$ 25.97 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1159 points
944% significantly better overall score
111 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

26 FPS
22 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

18 FPS
16 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

18 FPS
16 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

14 FPS
13 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1050 and the Quadro K2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

170.58 points
394% significantly higher Blender score
34.53 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

17206 points
621% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
2385 points
Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

7823 points
366% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score
1676 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

18573 points
621% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
2575 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

17953 points
586% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
2616 points
Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

7823 points
304% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score
1932 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

17967 points
475% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
3121 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

17163 points
556% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
2616 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1354 MHz
81% significantly higher core clock speed
745 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB
Identical
2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
Identical
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112.1 GB/s
289% significantly higher memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
55 W
36% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

46.56 Gigapixels/s
681% significantly higher pixel rate
5.96 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

58.2 Gigatexels/s
144% significantly higher texture rate
23.84 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640
66% significantly more shading units
384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

40
25% slightly more texture mapping units
32

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
100% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

254th of 586
493rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 October
2012 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

GeForce GTX 1050 vs Quadro K2000M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1050 beats the Quadro K2000M in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1050 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro K2000M has a slightly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1050 is faster than the Quadro K2000M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons