NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs Intel Iris Pro 5200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2 GB vs Intel Iris Pro 5200, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1159 points

526% significantly better overall score

185 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

26 FPS

21 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

5 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

18 FPS

15 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

18 FPS

15 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

14 FPS

12 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

2 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1050 and the Iris Pro 5200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

18573 points

263% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

5106 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

17967 points

266% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4909 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

17163 points

352% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

3791 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1354 MHz

576% significantly higher core clock speed

200 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1455 MHz

26% slightly higher boost clock speed

1150 MHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

45 W

66% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

46.56 Gigapixels/s

912% significantly higher pixel rate

4.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

58.2 Gigatexels/s

26% slightly higher texture rate

46 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640

100% significantly more shading units

320

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

700% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

253rd of 586

440th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 October

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.3

GeForce GTX 1050 vs Iris Pro 5200 specs and performance

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1050 graphics card is better than the Iris Pro 5200 in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1050 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1050 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Iris Pro 5200 has a significantly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 at 75 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1050 over the Iris Pro 5200.