AMD FX-6100 vs Intel N150

Compare AMD 3 core CPU vs Intel 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

1562 points

1% slightly better overall score

1546 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

2587 points

2906 points

12% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

1252 points

5% slightly better multitasking score

1186 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

1201 points

4% slightly better heavy workload score

1150 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the FX-6100 and the N150? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

27.00 points

31.61 points

17% slightly higher Blender score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

33% slightly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

49% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.3 GHz

312% significantly higher clock speed

0.8 GHz

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

6 MiB

200% significantly more L2 cache

2 MiB

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

8 MiB

33% slightly more L3 cache

6 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

795th of 1,089

802nd of 1,089

FX-6100 vs N150 benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the FX-6100 is faster than the N150. Despite this, the N150 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

With info from our database, we find that the N150 has slightly more cores with 4 cores whereas the FX-6100 has 3 cores. Despite this, the FX-6100 has more threads than the N150. Our comparison shows that the FX-6100 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the N150. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the FX-6100 has significantly more L2 cache than the N150. The FX-6100 also has slightly more L3 cache.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the FX-6100 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.