Intel Core i9-10900F vs AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 7 8845HS specs and performance

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Ryzen 7 8845HS performs better than the Core i9-10900F. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core i9-10900F in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Core i9-10900F has slightly more cores than the Ryzen 7 8845HS. Indeed, the Core i9-10900F has 10 cores compared to 8 cores found in the Ryzen 7 8845HS. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 7 8845HS. Our comparison shows that the Ryzen 7 8845HS has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Core i9-10900F. Despite this, the Core i9-10900F has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Ryzen 7 8845HS outputs less heat than Core i9-10900F thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The info from our database shows that the Ryzen 7 8845HS has more L2 cache than the Core i9-10900F. Despite this, the Core i9-10900F has slightly more L3 cache compared to the Ryzen 7 8845HS.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Core i9-10900F has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.