Core i9-10900F vs Core i9-11900F benchmarks
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Core i9-11900F performs better than the Core i9-10900F. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core i9-10900F in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Core i9-10900F has slightly more cores than the Core i9-11900F. Indeed, the Core i9-10900F has 10 cores compared to 8 cores found in the Core i9-11900F. It also has more threads than the Core i9-11900F. With our hardware info, we find that the Core i9-10900F has a slightly higher clock speed than the Core i9-11900F. In addition, both chips have the same turbo speed. Both these chips have an identical TDP (Thermal Design Power). This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the Core i9-11900F has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the Core i9-10900F. Despite this, the Core i9-10900F has slightly more L3 cache compared to the Core i9-11900F.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Core i9-10900F has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.