Intel Celeron 6305 vs Intel N150

Compare Intel Celeron 6000 Series 2 core CPU vs Intel 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

699 points

1546 points

121% significantly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

1529 points

2906 points

90% significantly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

499 points

1186 points

137% significantly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

478 points

1150 points

140% significantly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Celeron 6305 and the N150? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

10.52 points

31.61 points

200% significantly higher Blender score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

100% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

100% significantly more threads

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

1,029th of 1,089

802nd of 1,089

Family

The product line

Celeron 6000 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 November

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-3200

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Celeron 6305 vs N150 comparison

In our benchmarks, the N150 beats the Celeron 6305 in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Celeron 6305 in all gaming tests too.

When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the N150 has significantly more cores with 4 cores compared to the Celeron 6305 that has 2 cores. It also has more threads than the Celeron 6305.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. For instance, the Celeron 6305 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.