AMD A6-9500 vs AMD A6-6310

Compare AMD A6-Series APU for Desktops 2 core CPU vs AMD A6-Series APU for Desktops 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

790 points
14% slightly better overall score
689 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

1734 points
33% slightly better gaming score
1300 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

567 points
8% slightly better multitasking score
521 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

550 points
10% slightly better heavy workload score
500 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the A6-9500 and the A6-6310? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

12.14 points
74% significantly higher Blender score
6.97 points
Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

929 points
61% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score
574 points
Geekbench 5 (single) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

624 points
178% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score
224 points
Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

957 points
59% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score
600 points
Geekbench 6 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

641 points
181% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score
228 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

2
4
100% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

2
4
100% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.5 GHz
94% significantly higher clock speed
1.8 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.8 GHz
58% significantly higher turbo speed
2.4 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

65 W
15 W
333% significantly lower TDP

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

2
100% significantly more memory channels
1

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

1 MiB
2 MiB
100% significantly more L2 cache

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

1,006th of 1,089
1,034th of 1,089

Family

The product line

A6-Series APU for Desktops
A6-Series APU for Desktops

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 September
-

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4
DDR3

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

No
No

A6-9500 vs A6-6310 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the A6-6310 beats the A6-9500 in overall performance. Despite this, the A6-9500 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the A6-6310 has significantly more cores than the A6-9500. Indeed, the A6-6310 has 4 cores compared to 2 cores found in the A6-9500. It also has more threads than the A6-9500. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the A6-9500 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the A6-6310. The A6-6310 outputs less heat than A6-9500 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the A6-6310 has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the A6-9500

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. For instance, the A6-9500 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons