Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

Compare Intel Xeon E5 v4 Family 16 core CPU vs AMD Ryzen AI 300 Series 8 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

8324 points
2% slightly better overall score
8140 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

6186 points
10346 points
67% significantly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

9116 points
22% slightly better multitasking score
7437 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

9598 points
32% slightly better heavy workload score
7255 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-2697A v4 and the Ryzen AI 7 350? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

224.42 points
9% slightly higher Blender score
204.54 points
Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

8264 points
11339 points
37% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score
Geekbench 6 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1062 points
2485 points
133% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

16
100% significantly more cores
8

Threads

Number of logical processing units

32
100% significantly more threads
16

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2.60 GHz
30% slightly higher clock speed
2 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.6 GHz
5 GHz
38% slightly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

145 W
28 W
417% significantly lower TDP

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

4
100% significantly more memory channels
2

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

4 MiB
8 MiB
100% significantly more L2 cache

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

40 MiB
150% significantly more L3 cache
16 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

134th of 1,089
143rd of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 v4 Family
Ryzen AI 300 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 February
-

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-1600
DDR5

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes
-

Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Ryzen AI 7 350 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 beats the Ryzen AI 7 350 in overall performance. Despite this, the Ryzen AI 7 350 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has significantly more cores with 16 cores compared to the Ryzen AI 7 350 that has 8 cores. It also has more threads than the Ryzen AI 7 350. With our hardware info, we find that the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has a slightly higher clock speed than the Ryzen AI 7 350. Despite this, the Ryzen AI 7 350 has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Ryzen AI 7 350 outputs less heat than Xeon E5-2697A v4 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the Ryzen AI 7 350 has significantly more L2 cache than the Xeon E5-2697A v4. Despite this, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has significantly more L3 cache compared to the Ryzen AI 7 350.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons