Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS specs and performance
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS performs better than the Xeon E5-2697A v4. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2697A v4 in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has significantly more cores than the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 16 cores compared to 8 cores found in the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2697A v4. Also, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS outputs less heat than Xeon E5-2697A v4 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has significantly more L2 cache than the Xeon E5-2697A v4. Despite this, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has significantly more L3 cache compared to the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.