Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7600

Compare Intel Xeon E5 v4 Family 16 core CPU vs AMD Ryzen 5 6 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 1277.90

$ 190.07

$ 1087.83 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

8324 points

3% slightly better overall score

8046 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

6186 points

10893 points

76% significantly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

9116 points

27% slightly better multitasking score

7125 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

9598 points

39% slightly better heavy workload score

6898 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-2697A v4 and the Ryzen 5 7600? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

224.42 points

12% slightly higher Blender score

199.23 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

8264 points

12203 points

47% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1062 points

2751 points

159% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

166% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

166% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2.60 GHz

3.80 GHz

46% significantly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.6 GHz

5.1 GHz

41% slightly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

145 W

65 W

123% significantly lower TDP

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

4 MiB

6 MiB

49% significantly more L2 cache

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

40 MiB

25% slightly more L3 cache

32 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

134th of 1,089

147th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 v4 Family

Ryzen 5

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 February

2023 January

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-1600

DDR5

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Yes

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Ryzen 5 7600 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Ryzen 5 7600 is faster than the Xeon E5-2697A v4. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2697A v4 in all gaming tests too.

When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has significantly more cores with 16 cores compared to the Ryzen 5 7600 that has 6 cores. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 5 7600. With our hardware info, we find that the Ryzen 5 7600 has a significantly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-2697A v4. Also, the Ryzen 5 7600 has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Ryzen 5 7600 outputs less heat than Xeon E5-2697A v4 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The info from our database shows that the Ryzen 5 7600 has more L2 cache than the Xeon E5-2697A v4. Despite this, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has slightly more L3 cache compared to the Ryzen 5 7600.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.