Intel Xeon E5-2690 vs Intel Xeon X5675

Compare Intel Xeon E5 Family 8 core CPU vs Intel Xeon 6 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 141.61
$ 6.27 slightly less expensive
$ 147.88

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

4263 points
4455 points
4% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

5047 points
15% slightly better gaming score
4385 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

3997 points
4466 points
11% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

3919 points
4450 points
13% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-2690 and the Xeon X5675? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

73.79 points
36% slightly higher Blender score
53.89 points
Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3154 points
27% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score
2477 points
Geekbench 5 (single) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

528 points
4% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score
503 points
Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3487 points
43% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score
2434 points
Geekbench 6 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

586 points
16% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score
503 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

8
33% slightly more cores
6

Threads

Number of logical processing units

16
33% slightly more threads
12

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2.9 GHz
3.06 GHz
5% slightly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.8 GHz
9% slightly higher turbo speed
3.46 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

135 W
95 W
42% slightly lower TDP

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

4
33% slightly more memory channels
3

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

384 GiB
33% slightly more supported memory
288 GiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

413th of 1,089
393rd of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 Family
Xeon

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2012 February
2011 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3-1066
DDR3-1066

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes
Yes

Xeon E5-2690 vs Xeon X5675 specs and performance

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Xeon X5675 performs better than the Xeon E5-2690. Despite this, the Xeon E5-2690 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2690 has slightly more cores than the Xeon X5675. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2690 has 8 cores compared to 6 cores found in the Xeon X5675. It also has more threads than the Xeon X5675. Our comparison shows that the Xeon X5675 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2690. Despite this, the Xeon E5-2690 has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Xeon X5675 outputs less heat than Xeon E5-2690 thanks to a slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2690 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons