Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U

Compare Intel Xeon E5 v3 Family 10 core CPU vs AMD Ryzen PRO 5000 Series 6 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

4981 points

2% slightly better overall score

4845 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

5531 points

7020 points

26% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

4782 points

14% slightly better multitasking score

4182 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

4706 points

16% slightly better heavy workload score

4046 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-2687W v3 and the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

151.35 points

30% slightly higher Blender score

115.74 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

6616 points

21% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

5438 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1070 points

1625 points

51% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

66% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

66% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.10 GHz

34% slightly higher clock speed

2.30 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.5 GHz

4.3 GHz

22% slightly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

160 W

15 W

966% significantly lower TDP

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

2.5 MiB

3 MiB

20% slightly more L2 cache

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

25 MiB

56% significantly more L3 cache

16 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

351st of 1,089

360th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 v3 Family

Ryzen PRO 5000 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 August

2022 January

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-1600

DDR4

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Xeon E5-2687W v3 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Xeon E5-2687W v3 is faster than the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U. Despite this, the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2687W v3 has significantly more cores than the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2687W v3 has 10 cores compared to 6 cores found in the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U. With our hardware info, we find that the Xeon E5-2687W v3 has a slightly higher clock speed than the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U. Despite this, the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U outputs less heat than Xeon E5-2687W v3 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The info from our database shows that the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U has more L2 cache than the Xeon E5-2687W v3. Despite this, the Xeon E5-2687W v3 has significantly more L3 cache compared to the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2687W v3 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.