Xeon E5-2640 vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 comparison
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Xeon E5-2640 performs better than the Xeon E5-1620 v3. Despite this, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.
When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Xeon E5-2640 has significantly more cores with 6 cores compared to the Xeon E5-1620 v3 that has 4 cores. It also has more threads than the Xeon E5-1620 v3. Our comparison shows that the Xeon E5-1620 v3 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2640. Also, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Xeon E5-2640 CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-1620 v3 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.
Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2640 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.