Xeon E5-2640 vs Xeon E5-1620 v2 benchmarks
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Xeon E5-2640 is faster than the Xeon E5-1620 v2. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-1620 v2 in all gaming tests too.
With info from our database, we find that the Xeon E5-2640 has significantly more cores with 6 cores whereas the Xeon E5-1620 v2 has 4 cores. It also has more threads than the Xeon E5-1620 v2. Our comparison shows that the Xeon E5-1620 v2 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2640. Also, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Xeon E5-2640 CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-1620 v2 CPU because of its slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2640 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.