Xeon E5-2640 vs Xeon E5-1620 specs and performance
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Xeon E5-2640 is faster than the Xeon E5-1620. Despite this, the Xeon E5-1620 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.
When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Xeon E5-2640 has significantly more cores with 6 cores compared to the Xeon E5-1620 that has 4 cores. It also has more threads than the Xeon E5-1620. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Xeon E5-1620 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2640. Also, the Xeon E5-1620 has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Xeon E5-2640 CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-1620 CPU because of its slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2640 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.