Xeon E5-2640 vs Xeon E3-1535M v6 comparison
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Xeon E3-1535M v6 is faster than the Xeon E5-2640. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2640 in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2640 has significantly more cores than the Xeon E3-1535M v6. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2640 has 6 cores compared to 4 cores found in the Xeon E3-1535M v6. It also has more threads than the Xeon E3-1535M v6. Our comparison shows that the Xeon E3-1535M v6 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2640. Also, the Xeon E3-1535M v6 has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Xeon E3-1535M v6 outputs less heat than Xeon E5-2640 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The info from our database shows that the Xeon E5-2640 has more L2 cache than the Xeon E3-1535M v6. The Xeon E5-2640 also has significantly more L3 cache.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2640 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.