Intel Xeon E5-2640 vs AMD FX-9370

Compare Intel Xeon E5 Family 6 core CPU vs AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

AMD FX-9370

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 65.00

$ 147.02 significantly less expensive

$ 212.02

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2849 points

2% slightly better overall score

2779 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

3820 points

4131 points

8% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

2537 points

7% slightly better multitasking score

2350 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

2462 points

9% slightly better heavy workload score

2255 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-2640 and the FX-9370? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

47.31 points

51.74 points

9% slightly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3360 points

47% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

2272 points

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

558 points

2% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

545 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

2265 points

11% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

2031 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

450 points

514 points

14% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

49% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

49% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2.50 GHz

4.4 GHz

75% significantly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3 GHz

4.7 GHz

56% significantly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

95 W

131% significantly lower TDP

220 W

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

1.5 MiB

8 MiB

433% significantly more L2 cache

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

15 MiB

87% significantly more L3 cache

8 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

560th of 1,089

575th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 Family

FX 8-Core Black Edition

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2012 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3-1066

DDR3

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Yes

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Xeon E5-2640 vs FX-9370 specs and performance

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the FX-9370 performs better than the Xeon E5-2640. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2640 in all gaming tests too.

With info from our database, we find that the Xeon E5-2640 has significantly more cores with 6 cores whereas the FX-9370 has 4 cores. It also has more threads than the FX-9370. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the FX-9370 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2640. A Xeon E5-2640 CPU outputs less heat than a FX-9370 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the FX-9370 has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the Xeon E5-2640. Despite this, the Xeon E5-2640 has significantly more L3 cache compared to the FX-9370.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2640 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.