Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3

Compare Intel Xeon E5 v3 Family 8 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E5 v3 Family 12 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 63.20

$ 351.82 significantly less expensive

$ 415.02

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

5079 points

5502 points

8% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

5205 points

5267 points

1% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

5069 points

5565 points

9% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

5131 points

5563 points

8% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-2640 v3 and the Xeon E5-2690 v3? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

113.01 points

165.47 points

46% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

5241 points

6942 points

32% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1004 points

1009 points

0.50% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

5384 points

7090 points

31% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1040 points

1072 points

3% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

49% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

49% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2.6 GHz

Identical

2.6 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.4 GHz

3.5 GHz

2% slightly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

90 W

49% significantly lower TDP

135 W

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

Identical

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

Identical

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

768 GiB

Identical

768 GiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

341st of 1,089

294th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 v3 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-1600

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Xeon E5-2640 v3 vs Xeon E5-2690 v3 benchmarks

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Xeon E5-2690 v3 performs better than the Xeon E5-2640 v3. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2640 v3 in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2690 v3 has significantly more cores than the Xeon E5-2640 v3. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2690 v3 has 12 cores compared to 8 cores found in the Xeon E5-2640 v3. It also has more threads than the Xeon E5-2640 v3. In terms of clock speed, the Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Xeon E5-2690 v3 are identical in this regard. Despite this, the Xeon E5-2690 v3 has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Xeon E5-2640 v3 CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-2690 v3 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2640 v3 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.