Intel Xeon E5-2620 vs Intel Core i7-4910MQ

Compare Intel Xeon E5 Family 6 core CPU vs Intel 4th Generation Core i7 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 207.15
$ 142.73 significantly less expensive
$ 349.88

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2694 points
34% slightly better overall score
1998 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

3212 points
3258 points
1% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

2534 points
56% significantly better multitasking score
1623 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

2503 points
60% significantly better heavy workload score
1556 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-2620 and the Core i7-4910MQ? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

38.93 points
51.36 points
31% slightly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

2793 points
2980 points
6% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score
Geekbench 5 (single) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

459 points
887 points
93% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score
Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

1902 points
3398 points
78% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score
Geekbench 6 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

390 points
1126 points
188% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

6
49% significantly more cores
4

Threads

Number of logical processing units

12
49% significantly more threads
8

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2 GHz
2.90 GHz
45% significantly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
56% significantly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

95 W
47 W
102% significantly lower TDP

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

40
150% significantly more pcie lanes
16

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

4
100% significantly more memory channels
2

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

384 GiB
1100% significantly more supported memory
32 GiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

591st of 1,089
717th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 Family
4th Generation Core i7

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2012 February
2014 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes
No

Xeon E5-2620 vs Core i7-4910MQ benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Xeon E5-2620 is faster than the Core i7-4910MQ. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core i7-4910MQ in all gaming tests too.

With info from our database, we find that the Xeon E5-2620 has significantly more cores with 6 cores whereas the Core i7-4910MQ has 4 cores. It also has more threads than the Core i7-4910MQ. With our hardware info, we find that the Core i7-4910MQ has a significantly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-2620. Also, the Core i7-4910MQ has a significantly higher turbo speed. The Core i7-4910MQ outputs less heat than Xeon E5-2620 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2620 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons