Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6

Compare Intel Xeon E5 v3 Family 6 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E3 v6 Family 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

3203 points

4% slightly better overall score

3071 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

4260 points

4949 points

16% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

2869 points

14% slightly better multitasking score

2514 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

2793 points

15% slightly better heavy workload score

2413 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-2620 v3 and the Xeon E3-1505M v6? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

75.06 points

28% slightly higher Blender score

58.48 points

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3929 points

4% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

3744 points

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

901 points

1220 points

35% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

4121 points

15% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

3576 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

947 points

1243 points

31% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

49% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

49% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2.4 GHz

3 GHz

25% slightly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.2 GHz

4 GHz

25% slightly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

85 W

45 W

88% significantly lower TDP

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

150% significantly more pcie lanes

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

768 GiB

1100% significantly more supported memory

64 GiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

510th of 1,089

528th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 v3 Family

Xeon E3 v6 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 August

2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-1600

DDR4-2400

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs Xeon E3-1505M v6 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Xeon E5-2620 v3 is faster than the Xeon E3-1505M v6. Despite this, the Xeon E3-1505M v6 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has significantly more cores than the Xeon E3-1505M v6. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has 6 cores compared to 4 cores found in the Xeon E3-1505M v6. It also has more threads than the Xeon E3-1505M v6. With our hardware info, we find that the Xeon E3-1505M v6 has a slightly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-2620 v3. Also, the Xeon E3-1505M v6 has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Xeon E3-1505M v6 outputs less heat than Xeon E5-2620 v3 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.