Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X benchmarks
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X performs better than the Xeon E5-2620 v3. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2620 v3 in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has slightly more cores than the Xeon E5-2620 v3. Indeed, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has 8 cores compared to 6 cores found in the Xeon E5-2620 v3. It also has more threads than the Xeon E5-2620 v3. With our hardware info, we find that the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has a slightly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-2620 v3. Also, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Xeon E5-2620 v3 CPU outputs less heat than a Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X CPU because of its slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.