Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs FX-8320E specs and performance
In our benchmarks, the FX-8320E beats the Xeon E5-2609 v3 in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2609 v3 in all gaming tests too.
When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Xeon E5-2609 v3 has significantly more cores with 6 cores compared to the FX-8320E that has 4 cores. Despite this, the FX-8320E has more threads than the Xeon E5-2609 v3. With our hardware info, we find that the FX-8320E has a significantly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-2609 v3. A Xeon E5-2609 v3 CPU outputs less heat than a FX-8320E CPU because of its slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. For instance, the Xeon E5-2609 v3 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.