Xeon E5-1620 vs Xeon E5-2620 benchmarks
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Xeon E5-2620 performs better than the Xeon E5-1620. Despite this, the Xeon E5-1620 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.
When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Xeon E5-2620 has significantly more cores with 6 cores compared to the Xeon E5-1620 that has 4 cores. It also has more threads than the Xeon E5-1620. With our hardware info, we find that the Xeon E5-1620 has a significantly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-2620. Also, the Xeon E5-1620 has a significantly higher turbo speed. The Xeon E5-2620 outputs less heat than Xeon E5-1620 thanks to a slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Xeon E5-1620 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.