Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2620

Compare Intel Xeon E5 v3 Family 4 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E5 Family 6 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Intel Xeon E5-2620

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 119.95

$ 87.20 significantly less expensive

$ 207.15

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2681 points

2694 points

0.48% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

4224 points

31% slightly better gaming score

3212 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

2223 points

2534 points

13% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

2134 points

2503 points

17% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-1620 v3 and the Xeon E5-2620? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

61.49 points

57% significantly higher Blender score

38.93 points

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3546 points

26% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

2793 points

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1027 points

123% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

459 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3886 points

104% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

1902 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1093 points

180% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

390 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

49% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

49% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.5 GHz

75% significantly higher clock speed

2 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.6 GHz

44% significantly higher turbo speed

2.5 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

140 W

95 W

47% significantly lower TDP

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

Identical

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

Identical

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

768 GiB

100% significantly more supported memory

384 GiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

595th of 1,089

591st of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 v3 Family

Xeon E5 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 August

2012 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-1333

DDR3-1066

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Xeon E5-2620 specs and performance

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Xeon E5-2620 performs better than the Xeon E5-1620 v3. Despite this, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2620 has significantly more cores than the Xeon E5-1620 v3. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2620 has 6 cores compared to 4 cores found in the Xeon E5-1620 v3. It also has more threads than the Xeon E5-1620 v3. With our hardware info, we find that the Xeon E5-1620 v3 has a significantly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-2620. Also, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 has a significantly higher turbo speed. The Xeon E5-2620 outputs less heat than Xeon E5-1620 v3 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.