Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Intel Core i7-4700MQ

Compare Intel Xeon E5 v2 Family 4 core CPU vs Intel 4th Generation Core i7 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2286 points
2% slightly better overall score
2226 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

3603 points
3615 points
0.33% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

1895 points
4% slightly better multitasking score
1813 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

1822 points
5% slightly better heavy workload score
1735 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-1620 v2 and the Core i7-4700MQ? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

49.31 points
5% slightly higher Blender score
46.75 points
Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

2305 points
2898 points
25% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score
Geekbench 5 (single) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

633 points
961 points
51% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score
Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

2380 points
3110 points
30% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score
Geekbench 6 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

645 points
1019 points
57% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

4
Identical
4

Threads

Number of logical processing units

8
Identical
8

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.7 GHz
54% significantly higher clock speed
2.40 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.9 GHz
14% slightly higher turbo speed
3.4 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

130 W
47 W
176% significantly lower TDP

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

40
150% significantly more pcie lanes
16

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

4
100% significantly more memory channels
2

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

256 GiB
700% significantly more supported memory
32 GiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

665th of 1,089
676th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 v2 Family
4th Generation Core i7

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 August
2013 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes
No

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i7-4700MQ benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 beats the Core i7-4700MQ in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core i7-4700MQ in all gaming tests too.

When comparing these CPUs we notice that they have the same number of cores and the same number of threads. With our hardware info, we find that the Xeon E5-1620 v2 has a significantly higher clock speed than the Core i7-4700MQ. Also, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Core i7-4700MQ outputs less heat than Xeon E5-1620 v2 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons