Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3

Compare Intel Xeon E3 v3 Family 4 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E5 v3 Family 6 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2874 points

3203 points

11% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

4648 points

9% slightly better gaming score

4260 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

2349 points

2869 points

22% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

2254 points

2793 points

23% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E3-1270 v3 and the Xeon E5-2620 v3? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

65.90 points

75.06 points

13% slightly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3825 points

3929 points

2% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1137 points

26% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

901 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3898 points

4121 points

5% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1225 points

29% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

947 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

49% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

49% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.5 GHz

45% significantly higher clock speed

2.4 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.9 GHz

21% slightly higher turbo speed

3.2 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

80 W

6% slightly lower TDP

85 W

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

150% significantly more pcie lanes

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

32 GiB

768 GiB

2299% significantly more supported memory

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

573rd of 1,116

528th of 1,116

Family

The product line

Xeon E3 v3 Family

Xeon E5 v3 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 May

2014 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3-1333

DDR4-1600

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 specs and performance

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Xeon E5-2620 v3 performs better than the Xeon E3-1270 v3. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E3-1270 v3 in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has significantly more cores than the Xeon E3-1270 v3. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has 6 cores compared to 4 cores found in the Xeon E3-1270 v3. It also has more threads than the Xeon E3-1270 v3. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Xeon E3-1270 v3 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2620 v3. Also, the Xeon E3-1270 v3 has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Xeon E3-1270 v3 CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-2620 v3 CPU because of its slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Xeon E3-1270 v3 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.