Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2687W

Compare Intel Xeon E3 v3 Family 4 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E5 Family 8 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Intel Xeon E5-2687W

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 49.38

$ 949.62 significantly less expensive

$ 999.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2675 points

4113 points

53% significantly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

4187 points

4879 points

16% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

2229 points

3854 points

72% significantly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

2142 points

3775 points

76% significantly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E3-1231 v3 and the Xeon E5-2687W? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

65.17 points

87.34 points

34% slightly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3858 points

5319 points

37% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1168 points

63% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

716 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3756 points

9% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

3443 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1192 points

101% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

592 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

100% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

100% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.4 GHz

9% slightly higher clock speed

3.10 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.8 GHz

Identical

3.8 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

80 W

87% significantly lower TDP

150 W

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

150% significantly more pcie lanes

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

32 GiB

256 GiB

700% significantly more supported memory

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

598th of 1,089

426th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E3 v3 Family

Xeon E5 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 May

2012 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3-1333

DDR3-1066

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Xeon E3-1231 v3 vs Xeon E5-2687W specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Xeon E5-2687W beats the Xeon E3-1231 v3 in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E3-1231 v3 in all gaming tests too.

With info from our database, we find that the Xeon E5-2687W has significantly more cores with 8 cores whereas the Xeon E3-1231 v3 has 4 cores. It also has more threads than the Xeon E3-1231 v3. Our comparison shows that the Xeon E3-1231 v3 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2687W. In addition, both chips have the same turbo speed. A Xeon E3-1231 v3 CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-2687W CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the Xeon E3-1231 v3 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.